Corruption in Government Must STOP -
Obey the Constitution
_________________________
Why is Obedience to the State and Federal Constitutions so Important?
Because Public Officers commit heinous criminal acts EVERY DAY
which they would NOT commit if they honored their oaths to obey the Constitutions
________________________
More than a dozen of the documents filed by Magritz were not posted on PACER
Apparently the common thread in all of the unposted documents was that they showed that Magritz had:
- Filed in a different Court (district court of the United States) than the one in which this court was acting (United States District Court).
- Filed his case against the Respondents in their individual capacity for Breach of Fiduciary Duty (dishonesty and moral turpitude as OUTLAWS acting outside of the law) and not in their "official capacity" as officers or employees of a municipal Corporation.
- Filed his case for Breach of Fiduciary Duty as Trustees of the Public Trust, not as a statutory "civil rights" case.
The officers of the court knew exactly what Magritz was doing, and had to stop him,
lest other people find out how vulnerable these dishonest Public Officers really are when they act dishonestly.
Links to other filings NOP (Not On Pacer) are indicated on the Table of Contents page.
____________________
|
New residence address for Adam Y. Gerol, the District Attorney who maliciously filed a false prosecution against Magritz to shut him up by putting him in prison. Gerol double-teamed Magritz with crooked attorney Dennis E. Kenealy, the discredited Corporation Counsel for The Ozaukee County MOB. Gerol is an attorney who tried to put in prison an innocent man in order to cover up crimes of Public Officers. That is more despicable than a perverted baby raper since it requires evil intent by a person entrusted with doing good instead of doing evil. Gerol whined that he had prosecutorial immunity. What a joke. We, the attorneys, can rob, rape, and pillage you. And YOU do NOT get equal protection under the law. And the reason? Because WE are the pigs running Animal Farm.
|
| ||
____________________
|
Here is the proof of mailing of the Gerol change in residence address, the second batch of summons served, and the Errata and Table of Contents for Exhibit O.
|
| ||
____________________
|
This Notice to the Clerk was the transmittal of the last two summonses served upon the Respondents. It evidences the proper name in which to address the Complainant, the proper mailing location in care of the Notary Public, and the proper name of the Court in which the suit was filed.
|
| ||
____________________
|
This is the Notice to the Clerk, or transmittal, of the two Verified motions of Magritz to strike Interloper Baum's motion to dismiss her "official capacity" defendants, and the Interloper Attorney General of State of Wisconsin's motion to dismiss the "official capacity" judges and DA.
|
| ||
____________________
|
Magritz filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. This is the transmittal, or cover letter for that motion. There is obviously a pattern and practice of bias against Magritz. His cover letters are not posted on PACER, whereas those of opposing counsel are posted on PACER.
|
| ||
____________________
|
This Notice to the Clerk dated August 13, 2012, was the transmittal or cover letter for five (5) documents, yet the "Clerk", or whoever was pulling the clerk's chain, failed, yea refused, to post this Notice on PACER. Again we see unequal protection or application of the law (actually, "color of law", which means, "we just do it - because we can.")
|
| ||
____________________
Praecipe and Notice to the Clerk
|
Deceit of the Court exposed. The court had not sent Magritz a copy of the alleged "Order" dated June 29, 2012, ordering a response to the Motion To Dismiss filed by Deborah Baum of Pillsbury Law Firm on behalf of the Ozaukee County Defendants in their official capacity. The court had only sent Magritz what appeared to be an inter-office email. The reason was obvious. "They" (unknown named persons) didn't want Magritz to see that they had transferred his case out of the "district court of the United States" and into the "United States District Court", a totally different court. "They" also changed Complainant Magritz into "Plaintiff MAGRITZ". "They" also changed the case number. And, the "Order" was not signed.
|
| ||
Magritz sent the Praecipe and Notice and Request for documents along with tendered payment. His Praecipe was returned. Notice the "ORIGINAL" stamp on the returned Praecipe. Most of the documents Magritz requested were his own filings with the court that were not being reflected on PACER as having been received, which reminded Magritz of his Answer to the "tax foreclosure" that was stolen and concealed from the Ozaukee County circuit court file by Ozaukee County Corporation Counsel Dennis E. Kenealy in order to obtain a "default" judgment.
Notice the deceit of the court evidenced by "Kristin Brown", three weeks after the Praecipe was received by the court, and 2 days before the court "Order" dismissing the Magritz suit. Brown wrote for Magritz to specify which documents on the docket sheet Magritz wanted copies of. How disingenuous of these criminals. First "they" fail to record a filed document on the docket sheet, and then "they" state that copies can only be provided for documents shown on the docket sheet. Scum.
Magritz finally obtained a copy of the "Order" from a "Reginald D. Johnson", which he then refused for fraud.
Notice the deceit of the court evidenced by "Kristin Brown", three weeks after the Praecipe was received by the court, and 2 days before the court "Order" dismissing the Magritz suit. Brown wrote for Magritz to specify which documents on the docket sheet Magritz wanted copies of. How disingenuous of these criminals. First "they" fail to record a filed document on the docket sheet, and then "they" state that copies can only be provided for documents shown on the docket sheet. Scum.
Magritz finally obtained a copy of the "Order" from a "Reginald D. Johnson", which he then refused for fraud.
____________________
|
This Proposed Order for the judge to sign was not posted to the docket. The court was to respond to the VERIFIED
BILL QUIA TIMET, and, COMPLAINANT’S VERIFIED MOTIONS FOR: JURISDICTIONAL CLARIFICATION, and, CLARIFICATION OF UNSIGNED “ORDERS”. Why are these Public Officers so deceitful? Why don't they "get a life"? Oh. Right. They're the worse kind of bar flies.
|
| ||
____________________
|
Some people without any inkling of how this Beast system has deceptively enslaved men might think it of no consequence when a government agency transmogrifies names or creates legal persons or personas, or changes the names of courts or other entities. But the fact is if one remains silent and does not object to the fraud or deceit, then one assents to it. Best to call a spade a spade, and let the chips fall where they may. Let the dirtballs know you are not going to "take it" anymore.
|
| ||
____________________
Non-consent by Magritz to the Dolus sent by unknown named persons, "USDC court"
|
When Public Officers, who are Trustees, or Fiduciaries of the Public Trust, do not display honesty, integrity, and good faith to the people, who are the beneficiaries of the Public Trust, it is the duty of the people to let the Public Officer know that their dishonesty is not acceptable. Thus when Magritz received dolus from the court, presumably from Emmet G. Sullivan, who is obviously smart enough not to sign his name to a fraudulent document and then send it through the U.S. mail, Magritz returned the dolus to the sender.
|
| ||
____________________
|
Magritz did not file suit in the "court" that is issuing the dolus. But "Sullivan" keeps playing the game.
"Sticky Notes" on this in-house email that belongs in the outhouse: Sticky note 1: “Challenge the validity? Of an unsigned “Order”? An “Order” that’s pure BS? You’ve got to be kidding. These guys must be snorting Bill Clinton’s stash. What don't these clowns in gowns understand about the words "CANCELLED, Non-Acquiescence, Non-Consent, Non-Acceptance of Abnegation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and 'Order' by Officers of This Court." When they are told to "Go Pound Salt" that doesn't mean anything other than "Go Pound Salt" you insurrectionists and perjurers of your oath. Sticky note 2: Big mouth attorney “posturing” in a futile attempt to justify himself or herself and get in the "last" word. Their criminal misconduct from the beginning made it perfectly clear that they invoked the "doctrine of chaos". |
| ||
Go to the Prologue page for a timeline and summary description of what this website is about
Return to top of this page
Go to The Ozaukee MOB home page, www.OzaukeeMOB.org
Go to Public Officer Quislings and Traitors main page
Go to Lawless Sheriff Maurice A. "Maury" Straub page
Go to independent Investigative Reporter Gene Forte main page
Go to the "800 Lb Gorilla" Lawsuit for Breach of Fiduciary Duty main page
Return to top of this page
Go to The Ozaukee MOB home page, www.OzaukeeMOB.org
Go to Public Officer Quislings and Traitors main page
Go to Lawless Sheriff Maurice A. "Maury" Straub page
Go to independent Investigative Reporter Gene Forte main page
Go to the "800 Lb Gorilla" Lawsuit for Breach of Fiduciary Duty main page