OzaukeeMOB.org, 2003 Criminal Report filed with corrupt DA Williams

Corruption in Government Must STOP -
Obey the Constitution

.
.
______________________________
.
.

Criminal Report filed in 2003 with then District Attorney Sandy A. Williams

Property Rights Advocate Steven Magritz had repeatedly given Notice to the Public Officers, the members of the Ozaukee County MOB regarding the criminal acts of Corporation Counsel Dennis E. Kenealy, to which they turned a deaf ear and a blind eye, and for which Magritz was labeled a "paper terrorist". Magritz repeatedly Noticed The Ozaukee County MOB of the stealing of the Private Property of Magritz by way of a violent 24 member SWAT Team attack led by "Maury" Straub, which was based solely upon the criminal acts of Shyster attorney Kenealy. On October 7, 2002 Magritz had filed a Criminal Report with the state prosecutor, Sandy A. Williams. In 2003 Magritz again filed a Criminal Report with the state prosecutor, not that it really made much difference, since The Ozaukee County MOB, which included the state prosecutor, was going to steal, and did steal, the pristine, wooded, river frontage, Private Property and put Magritz on ice, preferably for life, come hell or high water. And the rest of the power structure of The Ozaukee County MOB was going to protect Shyster attorney Dennis E. Kenealy, no matter what.

.

Oct 2003 filed DA Williams.pdf
File Size:	1648 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

However, in 2003 Magritz filed the following "Affidavit of Criminal Report and Probable Cause By Witness and Victim of Criminal Activity" with the local prosecutor, District Attorney Sandy A. Williams, to record for posterity whether or not the District Attorney would act with honesty, integrity, and good faith, or act in breach of her fiduciary duty as a Trustee of the Public Trust and act in insurrection against the Constitution.  Sandy A. Williams chose to protect her buddy, Shyster attorney Dennis E. Kenealy, and the rest of The Ozaukee County MOB.  Sandy A. Williams chose to perjure her oath of office. Sandy A. Williams chose to breach her fiduciary duty as a Trustee of the Public Trust. Sandy A. Williams chose to act in insurrection to the Constitution. AGAIN.

As an aside, the District Attorney's office now refuses to provide a date stamped copy of an Affidavit of Criminal Report to the person filing the Affidavit if that "person" happens to be Property Rights Advocate Steven Magritz. This refusal to provide acknowledgement of the filing of a complaint against a Public Officer provides the District Attorney with plausible deniability. There is little or no evidence that a complaint has ever been filed, who was complained about, or what facts the complaint stated. It is also called, protect The Ozaukee County MOB at all costs. How many ways can one spell "misprision of felony"? When Magritz requested a file-stamped copy of his Report of Criminal Activity By Victim/Witness in 2011, the D.A.'s office summoned one of Lawless Sheriff Maurice A. "Maury" Straub's deputies and had Magritz escorted out of the building.

Return to Shyster Dennis E. Kenealy Resigns page
           Go to Verified Motion For Determination of Probable Cause
              Go to Corrupt Judges, DA's, & Attorneys page
Go to Evil "judge" Sandy A. Williams page

Did they die in vain?

OzaukeeMOB.org, Steven Alan Magritz W3797 Shady Lane Saukville, Wisconsin To: Sandy Williams, District Attorney 1201 S. Spring Street Port Washington, WI 53074 Attached hereto is an Affidavit of Criminal Report and Probable Cause by a Victim and Witness of Crime. This is in regard to acts committed by officials of Ozaukee County / County of Ozaukee. I request that you prosecute the actors for any and all criminal acts perpetrated and / or assented to as set forth in the aforesaid affidavit. I request that you respond to me within 30 days with a simple “yes” or “no” to the following: Are you (Sandy Williams) going to prosecute the perpetrators? Respectfully requested, Steven Alan Magritz, July 23, 2003.

OzaukeeMOB.org, Chippewa County, State of Wisconsin, SS: Affidavit of Criminal Report and Probable Cause By Witness and Victim of Criminal Activity I, Steven Alan Magritz, hereinafter Affiant, who is currently incarcerated at Stanley Correctional Institution, Stanley, Wisconsin, states that Affiant is of legal age, competent to testify, has personal first hand knowledge and believes that the truths and facts herein are true, correct, complete, certain, not misleading. Affiant has read Wisconsin Statutes Annotated (hereinafter WSA), including but not limited to 59.15 Neglect of duty-Supervisor; 59.25 Treasurer (including duties listed at 75.521(5)); 59.40 Clerk of Court and duties; 59.43 Register of Deeds (including duties listed at 77.22); 112 Uniform Fiduciaries Act; 134.01 Injury to business, reputation or calling; 403.420 Conversion of Instrument; 403.603 Discharge on Tender, 939.05 Parties to a crime (aiding and abetting); 939.31 Conspiracy; 939.641 Concealing identity; 940.30 False imprisonment; 940.31 Kidnapping; 940.34 Duty to report a crime; 940.43 Intimidation of witness - felony; 940.45 Intimidation of Victim - felony; 942.01 Defamation; 942.03 Giving false information for publication; 943.30 Extortion; 943.20(1)(b) Theft of negotiable security; 943.13 Trespass to land; 943.14 Criminal trespass to dwellings; 943.39 Fraudulent writings; 946.12 Misconduct in public office; 946.32 False swearing; 946.72 Tampering with public records and notices; 946.80-88 Wisconsin Organized Crime Control Act (RICO - Racketeering);and United States Code Annotated (USCA), Title 18 Section 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law; USCA 18 Sec 2071 Concealment, removal or mutilation generally; USCA 18 Sec 2073 False entries; 18 USCA Sec 1341 Frauds and swindles; 18 USCA Sec 1343 Wire fraud; 18 USCA Sec 1961 RICO definitions; 18 USCA Sec 1503 Obstruction of justice; 18 USCA Sec 1951 Hobbs Act -Extortion; and Affiant believes that because Affiant knows of these facts which appear to be criminal activity it would be unlawful for Affiant not to report these facts to the proper authorities by way of this affidavit. 1) Affiant gives notice of and incorporates by reference herein in their entirety the . following documents recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Ozaukee County, Wisconsin: The Notice of Reservation of Right To Initiate a Counterclaim and To Claim Official Bond or Surety, and, Notice of Public record, recorded in document number 675781, vol 1309,

OzaukeeMOB.org, pages 359 through 361; documents numbered 435131, 435132, 435133, 528822, 528823, 530358, 576044, 690081, 688709, 692784, 693378, 691601, 690214, 690080, 681666, 681667, 677834, 675442, 674178, 675781, 675637, 685051, 677585, 650771, 682591, 698039, 698040, 698041, 698042, 698440, 701453, 702647, 703696, 704274, and 708567. Affiant has not seen or been presented with any challenge or objection by any member of the Board of Supervisors of Ozaukee County or any officer, official, employee, agent or principal of Ozaukee County, to Affiant's claims of all of the givens and grants claimed by affiant under the original Land Patents 1435 and 672 granted by the President of the United States of America to the original Patentees in the years 1837 and 1840, which state in pertinent part:

OzaukeeMOB.org, On April 10, 2001, Karen L. Makoutz (hereinafter Makoutz) received via certified U.S. Mail from Affiant a negotiable Bill of Exchange in the amount of $182.14 for full and complete discharge of a

OzaukeeMOB.org, On April 26, 2001 the refusal and dishonor by Makoutz of the tender of payment of $22,634.97 (item #14 above) was protested by way of a Formal Certificate of Protest of Commercial Paper U.C.C. Sec 3-505 by a notary public and recorded in Deeds, document number 675781, page 357. Neither Affiant nor the protesting notary have ever received a response from Makoutz regarding either the tender of payment or the protest. Affiant has not seen or been presented with any material fact or claim by anyone that the tender of payment of the Certified Promissory Note in the amount of $22,634.97 on April 23, 2001 (item #14 above) did not constitute discharge of the alleged liability pursuant to WSA 403.603. On April 30, 2001 Makoutz was tendered payment in the amount of $22,634.97 for the discharge of the alleged liability against

OzaukeeMOB.org, 1) That the lands were not liable to taxation (WSA 75.521(7)(1), and, 2) That the tax was in fact paid before the last day of redemption (WSA 75.521(7)(2)). Both objections in the Answer and Claim as set forth in item, #25 above constitute complete defenses pursuant to WSA 75.521(10). Affiant was denied due process of law and a trial (as required by WSA 75.521(10) which states in pertinent part

OzaukeeMOB.org, A Certified Copy of the court record or

OzaukeeMOB.org, obtained judgment to Ozaukee County, which is a void judgment, in that fraud vitiates everything (Wis. 1955, GUZZO v GUZZO, 68N.W.2d 559, 269 Wis. 21). During the month of April, 2001 Affiant received via U.S. mail a letter from Kenealy in furtherance of Kenealy's scheme of unlawfully seizing Affiant's private property by obtaining a fraudulent and void judgment. During the month of July, 2001, Affiant received via U.S. mail a letter from Kenealy in furtherance of Kenealy's scheme of unlawfully seizing Affiant's private property, in which Kenealy stated that Kenealy had advised the Register of Deeds to NOT file Affiant's correction statement of Real Estate Transfer Tax Return, Form PE-500. Kenealy returned the Form PE-500 to Affiant with the aforesaid letter. The correction statement Form PE-500 (item #48 above) had been mailed to Ronald A. Voigt (hereinafter Voigt), Register of Deeds, via U.S. mail certified return receipt by a notary public on July 23, 2001 along with a request that Voigt expeditiously process said form in order to correct the public record. The public record was in error since September 14, 1990 due to a mistake in filling out the original form by Affiant. The imposition of Kenealy's will upon Voigt to procure an elected public officer (Voigt) to NOT do his (Voigt's) duty as required by Wisconsin Statutes is believed by Affiant to be a deliberate and intentional falsification of the public record for the purpose of causing an injury to Affiant by denying Affiant the ability to correct the public record (see admissions by Kenealy in Deeds, document number 708567). The correction statement (item #48) that Kenealy procured Voigt to NOT file can be viewed as an amendment to document number 01881263 filed at the Wisconsin Dept. of Financial Institutions. On May 30, 2003, Kenealy testified under oath at the Preliminary Hearing in Dane County Case No. 02-CF-1170. Regarding the PE-500 correction statement (item #48), Affiant asked Kenealy,

OzaukeeMOB.org, among others. On or about September 12, 2001, Kenealy mailed via U.S. mail to Affiant a Summons and Complaint in furtherance of his unlawful scheme to seize Affiant's property. Kenealy's Summons and Complaint was based on the fraudulently obtained void judgment signed by McCormack on August 9, 2001. Affiant believes that Kenealy's actions as set forth in item #55 above constitute intimidation of a witness of criminal activity (WSA 940.43) and intimidation of a victim of criminal activity (WSA 940.45). On September 24, 2001, Affiant had a 155 page Claim with supporting documents served on the Ozaukee County Board of Supervisors (hereinafter Board) pursuant to WSA 59.07 and WSA 893.80. See Deeds documents numbers 688709 and 692784. Affiant's Claim upon the Board (item #57) was served on Ozaukee County Clerk Harold Dobberpuhl at 2:35 P.M. by Ozaukee County Deputy Sheriff G.L. Speth. See Deeds document number 688709 page 325. Affiant's Claim upon the Board included elements of Affiant's Answer and Claim in Ozaukee County Case Number 01-CV-58-B3 with additional items regarding Kenealy's actions. Affiant requested the Board produce a claim of title superior to Affiant's or else declare VOID the tax certificate issued against Affiant's private land. See Deeds document number 688709, pages 321 through 326. The Board never heard Affiant's Claim (item #57) notwithstanding the $600,000 to $700,000 value involved. Upon reason and belief, County Clerk Harold Dobberpuhl breached Dobberpuhl's fiduciary duty by NOT presenting Affiant's Claim to the Board. Upon reason and belief, Harold Dobberpuhl transferred Affiant's Claim to Kenealy subsequent to a telephone call from Dobberpuhl to Kenealy. Upon reason and belief, Kenealy concealed Affiant's Claim (item #57) from the Board in furtherance of Kenealy's scheme to fraudulently seize Affiant's property. Notwithstanding the concealment of Affiant's Claim (item #57) from the Board by Kenealy, each and every member of the Board of Supervisors of Ozaukee County, Wisconsin was provided numerous written notices of Affiant's Claim via U.S., mail, evidenced by Proof of Service and documented by Certificates of Mailing by the United States Postal service. All of the notices to the individual members of the Board are extensively documented in Deeds, see item #1 above.

OzaukeeMOB.org, Affiant believes that each and every member of the Board has egregiously neglected his/her duty and failed to supervise and correct the actions of his/her employee, Kenealy. Beginning on or about September 13, 2001, the Ozaukee Press published numerous false, defamatory, inflammatory articles denigrating the character and reputation of Affiant, using words such as militia, posse comitatus, and anti-government. Upon information, reason and belief, the false, defamatory, inflammatory allegations and insinuations printed in the Ozaukee Press were the result of numerous telephone conversations by Kenealy with employees of the Ozaukee Press, particularly William F. Schanen IV. See WSA 942.01 Defamation, WSA 942.03 Giving false information for publication, and WSA 134.01 Injury to business, reputation or calling. Affiant believes that the purposes of Kenealy's slanderous statements and the resulting libel include, but are not limited to, destroying Affiant's standing and reputation in the community, galvanizing public sentiment against Affiant, destroying Affiant's credibility, setting up Affiant for a S.W.A.T. attack in which Affiant might suffer great bodily harm or be killed, all of which would father Kenealy's fraudulent scheme to seize Affiant's property and cover-up Kenealy's actions. Witnesses to items numbered 67, 68, and 69 above include, but are not limited to, William F. Schanen III and William F. Schanen IV. Affiant has never been a member of a militia group nor has Affiant ever attended a militia meeting. Affiant has never been a member of a Posse Comitatus group nor has Affiant ever attended a Posse Comitatus meeting. Affiant has never been a member of an anti-government group nor has Affiant ever attended an anti-government meeting. On or about October 5, 2001, Kenealy mailed Affiant via U.S. mail a letter dated October 5, 2001 in furtherance of Kenealy's fraudulent scheme to seize Affiant's property, as recorded in Deeds document number 690081, page 277. In October, 2001, Kenealy, based on Kenealy's fraudulently obtained void judgment in Ozaukee County Case No. 01-CV-58-B3, enlisted the assistance of Maurice A. Straub in removing by force of arms both Affiant and Chieko Magritz from their residence in Fredonia township, Ozaukee County, Wisconsin state against their will. On October 24, 2001, Maurice A. Straub and dozens of his heavily armed men, some with assault rifles (

OzaukeeMOB.org, Black's Law Dictionary, 6th edition, defines kidnapping, in pertinent part, as follows:

OzaukeeMOB.org, Absolutely none of the Board members ever responded to Affiant, thereby apparently evidencing complicity with Kenealy, or at the very least, egregious neglect of duty and failure to correct wrongs when brought to their attention. Kenealy's apparent duplicity is not justification or excuse for the actions or inactions or failure of any Board member to supervise an employee (Kenealy), as every member has sworn his/her own oath. furthermore, ignorance of the law is no excuse. (

Go to the Prologue page for a timeline and summary description of what this website is about

Corruption in Government Must STOP -Obey the Constitution

Criminal Report filed in 2003 with then District Attorney Sandy A. Williams

.

Corruption in Government Must STOP -
Obey the Constitution