Corruption in Government Must STOP -
Obey the Constitution
_________________________
Why is Obedience to the State and Federal Constitutions so Important?
Because Public Officers commit heinous criminal acts EVERY DAY
which they would NOT commit if they honored their oaths to obey the Constitutions
_______________
Attorneys commit crimes that are covered up other attorneys,
judges, and other public officers
Those who cover-up the crimes are more dishonest, corrupt, crooked, culpable, immoral, reprobate, decadent, degenerate, worthy of punishment, etc.,
than the original crime-committing attorney.
____________________
Serving in Public Office is a PRIVILEGE
WHY?
Because it is a privilege for a man to be deemed to be of the highest moral character, exhibiting such honesty, integrity, and good faith that other men would trust such a man to protect their life, liberty, and property. A man who is unfaithful and breaches such a sacred Trust is of such moral turpitude as to have descended below the level of a baby-raper, for such a one has figuratively raped the unborn as well as those who already have been born.
Public Officers that do not act with the highest fidelity to the Constitutions they are required to support exhibit contempt and disrespect for the high calling of public office.
Because it is a privilege for a man to be deemed to be of the highest moral character, exhibiting such honesty, integrity, and good faith that other men would trust such a man to protect their life, liberty, and property. A man who is unfaithful and breaches such a sacred Trust is of such moral turpitude as to have descended below the level of a baby-raper, for such a one has figuratively raped the unborn as well as those who already have been born.
Public Officers that do not act with the highest fidelity to the Constitutions they are required to support exhibit contempt and disrespect for the high calling of public office.
_________________________
Federal judge Lynn S. Adelman, United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin, admitted, nihil dicit, that he wrongfully dismissed Magritz’s habeas petition.
Adelman has:
Acted in rebellion against the Constitution in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 2383, and, having devised an artifice to defraud another of the intangible right to honest services, executing and causing to be mailed via United States Postal Service a fraudulent “Decision and Order” in violation of Title 18 § 1341 and Title 18 § 1346, in violation of the false statements act as codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(1) and (3), and, violating the prohibition against obstructing justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1512(2) by “misleading conduct” as defined at 18 U.S.C. § 1515 (a)(3).
In order to cover up his malversation, Adelman refused to issue a certificate of appealability, thus Magritz had to first pay the exorbitant filing fee for an appeal, then, at the very same time, ask for “permission” to appeal by filing a “Request for Certificate of Appealability”.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals failed / refused to forward Magritz’s Request to Circuit Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The “court” stalled and stonewalled almost seven months without even appointing a three judge panel to hear the Request.
Then Magritz, following the “suggestion” of the DOJ civil division, filed a criminal complaint titled “Informant’s Report of Felonies Cognizable by a Court of the United States, Reported Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4” with Attorney General William Barr, local FBI-SAC Robert E. Hughes, and Chief Judge Diane Pamela Wood.
Wood, or someone in the clerk’s office under her control, improperly and wrongfully filed the complaint against Judge Lynn S. Adelman in Magritz’s habeas corpus appeal. In less than two weeks, after stonewalling almost seven (7) months, Magritz’s request for a certificate was “submitted” and feloniously “denied” on patently false “grounds”, allegedly by a two judge panel consisting of Michael Brian Brennan and Michael Yale Scudder, Jr.
The criminal complaint, which was intended to be confidential and seen only by Chief Judge Wood, but was improperly filed in the habeas appeal and thus made public for the whole world to see, obviously prompted “someone” in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to immediately cover up the corruption of district court judge Adelman by wrongfully denying on false grounds the Magritz request for a certificate of appealability.
Here is the “Request for Certificate of Appealability” and the “Informant’s Report of Felonies” improperly filed by Chief Judge Wood in case No. 19-1518, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals:
Adelman has:
Acted in rebellion against the Constitution in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 2383, and, having devised an artifice to defraud another of the intangible right to honest services, executing and causing to be mailed via United States Postal Service a fraudulent “Decision and Order” in violation of Title 18 § 1341 and Title 18 § 1346, in violation of the false statements act as codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(1) and (3), and, violating the prohibition against obstructing justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1512(2) by “misleading conduct” as defined at 18 U.S.C. § 1515 (a)(3).
In order to cover up his malversation, Adelman refused to issue a certificate of appealability, thus Magritz had to first pay the exorbitant filing fee for an appeal, then, at the very same time, ask for “permission” to appeal by filing a “Request for Certificate of Appealability”.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals failed / refused to forward Magritz’s Request to Circuit Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The “court” stalled and stonewalled almost seven months without even appointing a three judge panel to hear the Request.
Then Magritz, following the “suggestion” of the DOJ civil division, filed a criminal complaint titled “Informant’s Report of Felonies Cognizable by a Court of the United States, Reported Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4” with Attorney General William Barr, local FBI-SAC Robert E. Hughes, and Chief Judge Diane Pamela Wood.
Wood, or someone in the clerk’s office under her control, improperly and wrongfully filed the complaint against Judge Lynn S. Adelman in Magritz’s habeas corpus appeal. In less than two weeks, after stonewalling almost seven (7) months, Magritz’s request for a certificate was “submitted” and feloniously “denied” on patently false “grounds”, allegedly by a two judge panel consisting of Michael Brian Brennan and Michael Yale Scudder, Jr.
The criminal complaint, which was intended to be confidential and seen only by Chief Judge Wood, but was improperly filed in the habeas appeal and thus made public for the whole world to see, obviously prompted “someone” in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to immediately cover up the corruption of district court judge Adelman by wrongfully denying on false grounds the Magritz request for a certificate of appealability.
Here is the “Request for Certificate of Appealability” and the “Informant’s Report of Felonies” improperly filed by Chief Judge Wood in case No. 19-1518, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals:
|
| ||||
____________________
|
Here is the false, fraudulent Order allegedly issued by Brennan and Scudder covering up the crimes of state court judge Sandy A. Williams and E.D.of Wis. federal judge Lynn S. Adelman.
|
| ||
____________________
Here are the December 1, 2019 cover letters for the Informant's Criminal Report (complaint) filed with the U.S. Attorneys in Milwaukee and Chicago
| 19-12-01 Letter to Matthew D. Krueger in Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
| 19-12-01 Letter to John R. Lausch, Jr. in Chicago, Illinois |